Showing posts with label chemotherapy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label chemotherapy. Show all posts

Sunday, December 30, 2012

Treatment of diffuse large B cell lymphoma.


Treatment of diffuse large B cell lymphoma.


Dec 2012

Source

Department of Internal Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea.

Abstract


Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in all countries and all age groups. DLBCL is potentially curable, and the outcome of patients with DLBCL has completely changed with the introduction of therapy involving the monoclonal antibody rituximab in combination with chemotherapy. Nonetheless, relapse is detected after treatment with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone in approximately 30% of patients. It has recently become clear that DLBCL represents a heterogeneous admixture of quite different entities. Gene expression profiling has uncovered DLBCL subtypes that have distinct clinical behaviors and prognoses; however, incorporation of this information into treatment algorithms awaits further investigation. Future approaches to DLBCL treatment will use this new genetic information to identify potential biomarkers for prognosis and targets for treatment.

Full text article:

Thursday, December 13, 2012

Is there any role for transplantation in the rituximab era for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma?


Is there any role for transplantation in the rituximab era for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma?


2012

Source

1Hospital Saint Louis, Paris Diderot University, Paris, France.

Abstract


Salvage chemotherapy followed by high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation is the standard of treatment for chemosensitive relapses in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The addition of rituximab to chemotherapy has improved the response rate and failure-free survival after first-line treatment and relapses. Fewer relapses are expected, although there is no consensus on the best salvage regimen. The intergroup Collaborative Trial in Relapsed Aggressive Lymphoma (CORAL) set the limits for this standard of treatment after first comparing 2 salvage regimens: rituximab, ifosfamide, etoposide, and carboplatin (R-ICE) and rituximab, dexamethasone, aracytine, and cisplatin (R-DHAP). There was no difference in response rates or survivals between these salvage regimens. Several factors affected survival: prior treatment with rituximab, early relapse (< 12 months), and a secondary International Prognostic Index score of 2-3. For patients with 2 factors, the response rate to salvage was only 46%, which identified easily a group with poor outcome. Moreover, patients with an ABC subtype or c-MYC translocation responded poorly to treatment. More than 70% of patients will not benefit from standard salvage therapy, and continued progress is needed. Studies evaluating immunotherapy after transplantation, including allotransplantation, new conditioning regimens with radioimmunotherapy and other combinations of chemotherapy based on diffuse large B-cell lymphoma subtype, are discussed herein. Early relapses and/or patients refractory to upfront rituximab-based chemotherapy have a poor response rate and prognosis. A better biological understanding of these patients and new approaches are warranted.

Sunday, November 11, 2012

Prognostic significance of rituximab and radiotherapy for patients with primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma receiving doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy.


Prognostic significance of rituximab and radiotherapy for patients with primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma receiving doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy.


Nov 2012

Abstract


The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic importance of rituximab and radiotherapy in patients with primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) receiving doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy. Seventy-nine patients with PMBCL received CHOP chemotherapy with (n = 39) or without rituximab (n = 40), and 60 patients received additional radiotherapy. Patients treated with R-CHOP had significantly superior survival rates. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free (PFS) rates were 83.7% and 76.7% for R-CHOP, compared with 48.3% (P=0.011) and 44.2% (P=0.012) for CHOP, respectively. Similarly, the 5-year OS and PFS rates for early stage patients were 93.8% and 84.6% with R-CHOP, and 52.0% (P=0.002) and 46.6% (P=0.003) with CHOP, respectively. Patients treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy had better survival and local control (LC) rates compared with chemotherapy alone. The 5-year OS, PFS and LC rates for early stage patients were 73.6%, 69.9% and 92.6% for chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and 50.8% (P = 0.076), 36.9% (P = 0.008) and 56.4% (P<0.001) for chemotherapy alone, respectively. Early stage patients treated with R-CHOP and radiotherapy had 5-year OS, PFS and LC rates of 96.4%, 85.9% and 93.1%. R-CHOP plus consolidation radiotherapy was associated with excellent survival and LC rates.

Monday, November 5, 2012

Long-term remission of primary bone marrow diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with high-dose chemotherapy rescued by in vivo rituximab-purged autologous stem cells.


Long-term remission of primary bone marrow diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with high-dose chemotherapy rescued by in vivo rituximab-purged autologous stem cells.


2012

Source

Department of Hematology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1, Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8666, Japan.

Abstract


Primary bone marrow diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a rare type of extranodal lymphoma with poor prognosis. Here, we report a case of primary bone marrow DLBCL successfully treated with high-dose chemotherapy and rescued by in vivo rituximab-purged autologous stem cells. A 39-year-old woman visited our hospital because of anemia. Bone marrow examination revealed a large B-cell lymphoma invasion. An (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scan revealed disseminated bone marrow uptake without evidence of dissemination at other sites. These findings led to a diagnosis of primary bone marrow DLBCL. Our patient underwent R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone) chemotherapy and achieved complete remission. Subsequently, she received high-dose chemotherapy with an in vivo rituximab-purged autologous stem cell transplant. Seven years have passed since the transplantation, and she remains in remission. This suggests that transplantation of an in vivo rituximab-purged autograft is a promising strategy for primary bone marrow DLBCL.

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Incidence, risk factors and outcome of histological transformation in follicular lymphoma.

Incidence, risk factors and outcome of histological transformation in follicular lymphoma.


Feb. 2012

Source

Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Bellinzona, Switzerland.

Abstract


Histological transformation (HT) into diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) was documented in 37 of the 281 (13%; 95% CI, 9-18) follicular lymphoma (FL) patients treated at our institute from 1979 to 2007. HT occurred at a median of 2·75 years from initial FL diagnosis and HT rate was 15% at 10 years and 26% at 14 years, with a plateau from that point onward. Patients with bulky or extranodal disease, or those diagnosed before 1990 had a significantly higher risk of HT. When initial treatment strategies were taken into account, a reduced HT risk was seen in the patients initially managed with a 'watch and wait' policy, while the risk appeared significantly increased in the small subset of 18 patients initially managed with rituximab plus chemotherapy (P = 0·0005). HT was associated with a significantly shorter cause-specific survival (P = 0·0002). Predictors of survival after HT were the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index at diagnosis, as well as age and performance status at the time of HT. Our data confirm the adverse clinical outcome of FL after HT. In keeping with previous isolated reports, our findings suggest that there is a subgroup of patients in whom HT may not occur.


PubMed

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Serum C-reactive protein as an important prognostic variable in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma.

Serum C-reactive protein as an important prognostic variable in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma.


Feb 2012

Serum C-reactive protein as an important prognostic variable in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma.

Source

State Key Laboratory of Oncology, South China, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People's Republic of China.

Abstract

C-reactive protein (CRP) is an acute-phase reactant that is a promising biomarker in patients with cancer of many kinds. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate significant changes in CRP levels as a parameter for the response effect and long-term survival of patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Serum CRP data were collected in 94 patients with DLBCL from October 2006 to August 2009 in Cancer Center, Sun Yat-Sen University. Results were correlated with clinical data. The median CRP serum level in patients with DLBCL was 30.91 ± 53.35 in male and 22.39 ± 29.89 mg/L in female. Base line CRP levels were correlated with International Prognostic Index (IPI) scores (p = 0.03). Among the patients with an IPI score of 1-2, base line CRP levels were correlated with long-term survival (p = 0.001). Base line CRP levels were also correlated with OS (p = 0.001) and varied with different clinical stages (p = 0.03). The corresponding CRP levels in the patients with 2 cycles of chemotherapy were correlated with short-term treatment response (p = 0.003) and OS (p = 0.04) or TTP (p = 0.03). CRP serum levels can be used as additional prognostic parameter in patients with diffuse large B cell type lymphoma.


PubMed

Friday, February 10, 2012

Arm and Leg Swelling After B-cell Lymphoma

Arm and Leg Swelling After B-cell lymphoma.

With the advent of better and more effective cancer treatments, the survival rate for all cancers has risen dramatically. With this progress, a new and often misunderstood and misdiagnosed complication has arisen.

Many cancer survivors , having overcome cancer, find themselves with sudden and often unexplained swelling, usually of the arms or of the legs.

This swelling occurs because of one of several factors.

First, the swelling begins after lymph nodes have been removed for cancer biopsies.

Second, the swelling may start as a result of radiation damage to either the lymph nodes and/or the lymph system.

Due to either the removal of lymph nodes or damage to the lymph system, your body is no longer able to rid itself of excess fluids. The fluids collect in the limbs effected and swelling begins.

This swelling is called lymphedema and it can effect either your leg or your arm. The swelling that occurs is permanent, and while it is not curable it is treatable.

Hopefully, in the future with radiological scans becoming more sensitive and with increased use of such techniques such as the small needle biopsy, we can put an end to this epidemic of secondary lymphedema from cancer biopsy.

Permanent Leg or Arm Swelling

In the situation of any permanent leg swelling whether the cause is known or unknown, the diagnoses of lymphedema must be considered

There are several groups of people who experience leg or arm swelling from known causes, but it doesn't go away or unknown causes where the swelling can actually get worse as time goes by.

Group One

This group includes those who have had the injuries, infections, insect bites, trauma to the leg, surgeries or reaction to a medication. When this swelling does not go away, and becomes permanent it is calledsecondary lymphedema.

Group Two

Another extremely large group that experiences permanent leg or arm swelling arecancer patients, people who are morbidly obese, or those with the condition called lepedema. What causes the swelling to remain permanent is that the lymph system has been so damaged that it can no longer operate normally in removing the body's waste fluid.

In cancer patients this is the result of either removal of the lymph nodes for cancer biopsy, radiation damage to the lymph system, or damage from tumor/cancer surgeries.

This is also referred to as secondary lymphedema.

Group Three

Group three consists of people who have leg or arm swelling from seemingly unknown reasons. There may be no injury, no cancer, no trauma, but for some reason the leg simply is swollen all the time.

The swelling may start at birth, it may begin at puberty, or may begin in the 3rd, 4th or even 5th decade of life or sometimes later.

This type of leg or arm swelling is called primary lymphedema. It can be caused by a genetic defect, malformation or damage to the lymph system while in the womb or at birth or be part of another birth condition that also effects the lymph system.

This is an extremely serious medical condition that must be diagnosed early, and treated quickly so as to avoid painful, debilitating and even life threatening complications. Treatment should NOT include the use of diuretics.